The United States Copyright Office (USCO) recently denied copyright to a work of AI-generated visual art, claiming that it only provides protection to “the fruits of intellectual labor. Anonymous DJ SPLY85 is enthusiastic about the recent debate sparked in the music industry by this decision. In his opinion, lively discourse and smart regulation drive innovation in the right direction. 

Visit for more information

“Public discourse like this is important,” SPLY85 says. “The court’s decision makes sense for now as we wrestle with what exactly AI is. We’re entering a complex space when it comes to the ownership rights and creative powers of borderline-sentient technology. Technology is moving fast, and we don’t seem to have the legislative speed to keep up.”

The debate on whether AI-generated art deserves copyright

Whether or not AI-generated compositions deserve the same copyright protection as those created by humans is a complex question without a clear-cut answer. On the one hand, AI-generated compositions can represent a significant investment of time, resources, and creativity. Creators often design advanced algorithms and machine-learning techniques to generate their musical ideas and arrangements.


On the other hand, AI-generated compositions are not the product of the human mind; human composers employ their experiences, emotions, and perspectives as they create original compositions that reflect thoughts and feelings, while AI systems generate compositions based on algorithms and data sets. Because AI systems generate compositions based on patterns and rules, the works they create lack the same emotional depth and expressiveness as those created by human minds. The unpredictability and randomness human composers incorporate add interest and make compositions more engaging. As AI systems generate music based on algorithms, compositions often sound too precise.

“Some argue that AI-generated works demonstrate creativity and originality, and others claim they are simply the result of algorithms and mathematical rules,” says SPLY85. “Today, copyright protection is based on human creativity and intellectual effort, but as the role of AI in the creative process increases, it may soon require changes in current copyright laws.”

Pros and cons of copyright protection for AI-generated musical compositions

Recognizing AI-generated compositions as creative output deserving of copyright offers a future with several potential benefits. First, this move could encourage greater innovation in AI technology and its application to the creative arts. It could also create new sources of revenue for human artists, expand the music industry, and create opportunities for human musicians to reach new audiences. Finally, extending copyright privilege would benefit musicians by validating AI as a creative tool at their disposal.

However, moving away from a copyright system based on human creativity and intellectual effort causes some to warn of negative repercussions. Some worry people will place decreasing value on human compositions, which raises ethical and philosophical concerns about the role of AI in society. Recognizing AI-generated compositions with copyright could also lead to conflicts over ownership and royalties.

The future of copyright protection for AI-generated works of music

In the coming years, legal and legislative action will continue to clarify the relationship between AI and copyright. Future decisions are likely to be shaped by technological advancements, legal and legislative developments, and public attitudes and opinions.

Copyright laws may be modified or adapted to better reflect the realities of a world in which AI plays a more significant role in the creation of creative works. Alternatively, new forms of legal protection may be created specifically for AI-generated works.

“Today’s copyright laws were designed for a world where creative works were solely the product of human authorship,” concludes SPLY85. “They aren’t equipped to handle the emerging realities of AI-generated compositions. The copyright debate raises important questions about the nature of creativity and the role of technology in the creative process. Keep an open mind and stay informed on this issue because it will have a significant impact on the future of the creative industries and the role of AI in our society.”

About The Author

Senior Editor

Shawn Grant is a Chicago native and the Senior Editor of The Source Magazine. He can only be found on Instagram and Twitter at @shawnxgrant.

Related Posts