As Donald Trump assumes the presidency in 2025, the gambling industry is keenly observing how his administration might influence state-level gaming legislation. Trump’s extensive background in the casino sector, notably his ownership of several Atlantic City establishments in the 1980s and 1990s, suggests a potential inclination towards policies that could either bolster or impede gambling initiatives across various states.
Historically, Trump’s stance on gambling has been multifaceted. In a 2015 interview, he remarked on sports betting, stating, “I’m OK with it because it’s happening anyway.” This pragmatic view indicates an acknowledgement of the pervasive nature of gambling activities and a possible openness to their regulation. However, his administration’s actions have sometimes sent mixed signals. For instance, during his first term, the Department of Justice revisited the interpretation of the Wire Act, leading to concerns about the future of online gaming.
The influence of key figures within Trump’s circle cannot be overlooked. Notably, Sheldon Adelson, a prominent casino magnate and significant supporter of Trump’s campaigns, has been a vocal opponent of online gambling. Adelson’s substantial contributions, including a $5 million donation to Trump’s inauguration, have raised questions about potential policy shifts favouring land-based casinos over online platforms. This dynamic suggests that while there might be support for traditional casino operations, online gambling could face increased scrutiny.
On the other hand, industry leaders express optimism about the potential for deregulation and expansion under Trump’s leadership. The American Gaming Association has advocated for fewer federal regulations and the approval of sports betting, emphasising the economic benefits and the need to curb illegal gambling operations. Bill Miller, president and CEO of the AGA, highlighted the unprecedented support the gaming industry received during Trump’s first term, noting federal economic relief measures that benefited the sector.
State-level initiatives are also gaining momentum. Several states, including New York, Indiana, and Wyoming, are considering legislation to legalise online casinos and sports betting. The perceived support from the White House, especially from a president with firsthand experience in the casino industry, could serve as a catalyst for these efforts. Industry experts believe that Trump’s business-friendly approach may encourage states to pursue gambling expansion, viewing it as a viable avenue for economic growth.
However, challenges persist. The potential for increased federal oversight, especially concerning online gambling, remains a concern. The 2019 reinterpretation of the Wire Act by the Department of Justice, which extended its scope to all forms of interstate gambling, introduced uncertainties that could influence future state decisions. Additionally, opposition from conservative groups and competing interests within the industry may hinder the progress of pro-gambling legislation. It may even have a knock-on positive effect on online casinos in Canada.
In conclusion, Trump’s inauguration presents a complex landscape for gambling bills in various states. While his personal history and certain administrative actions suggest potential support for the industry’s expansion, external influences and internal policy decisions could create obstacles. States aiming to advance gambling legislation must navigate this intricate environment, balancing opportunities for growth with the challenges posed by federal dynamics and diverse stakeholders.