UMG Fires Back at Drake Appeal Over Kendrick Lamar Track, Calls Lawsuit “Hypocritical”

UMG has filed a new appellate brief pushing to keep the dismissal of Drake’s defamation lawsuit tied to Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.”

In the 83 page filing submitted March 27, UMG argues that Drake’s effort to revive the case is “astoundingly hypocritical” and “illogical,” claiming the rapper is attempting to “turn the law upside down” after losing a high profile rap feud.

The label is backing an October 2025 decision by U.S. District Judge Jeannette A. Vargas, who dismissed the original lawsuit. UMG maintains that Lamar’s lyrics, including references labeling Drake a pedophile, fall under protected opinion within the context of a “heated rap battle,” and therefore cannot be treated as defamation.

Drake’s legal team previously challenged that ruling in January 2026 with a 117 page appeal. In their argument, they claim the lower court’s reasoning creates a “dangerous categorical rule” that could allow defamatory statements to be shielded simply because they appear in a rap song.

At the center of the dispute is the phrase “certified pedophile,” which Drake argues carries a specific and provable meaning, making it a factual claim rather than artistic exaggeration.

The appeal also revisits broader accusations against UMG, alleging the company used “deceptive business practices” to elevate the track’s performance. Those claims include suggestions of radio payola and artificially inflated streaming numbers through bots.

The case now moves deeper into the appellate process. Drake’s team filed its opening brief on January 21, and UMG’s response was due March 27. A final reply from Drake’s attorneys is expected by April 17, 2026.

Following that, the court may choose to schedule oral arguments where both sides present their positions in person. If no hearing is set, a panel of judges will review the written submissions and issue a decision.

The outcome could carry broader implications for how courts interpret lyrical content in rap and whether artistic expression can shield artists and labels from defamation claims.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *