Another day, another lawsuit. Nick Cannon is facing a legal battle this time after Viacom filed a lawsuit accusing Zeus Network of copying its iconic series Wild ’N Out for their new show Bad vs. Wild. Viacom claims Zeus intentionally lifted key elements from Wild ’N Out, including the format, set design, and celebrity appearances, without creating original content.
First, look at the trailer for Bad vs. Wild and put things into context …
Get this: Viacom’s attorney, George W. Kroup, stated, “Zeus intentionally copied Wild ‘N Out when developing Bad vs. Wild, fully aware it was infringing on Viacom’s intellectual property.” He further argued that Cannon’s involvement with Zeus — especially given his long history as the host of Wild ’N Out — strengthens their claim that the network is trying to profit off an established brand.
The lawsuit lists numerous similarities between the two shows, including the live audience format, DJ-led scoring, celebrity guest appearances, and championship prizes — all trademarks of Wild ’N Out, according to Viacom. The company argues that Bad vs. Wild is an imitation and a near-exact replica of its hit series.
Another point of contention is Cannon’s participation in the rival show. Viacom claims that hosting Bad vs. Wild breaches Cannon’s contract, prohibiting him from working on shows that compete with or mirror Wild ’N Out. The lawsuit accuses Zeus of enticing Cannon to break his contract by producing the competing show.
Additionally, Viacom alleges that Zeus marketed Bad vs. Wild as a hyper-charged version of Wild ’N Out, promoting it as “Wild ’N Out on steroids.” Viacom also takes issue with the explicit content and controversial episodes, such as the “Lightskin vs. Darkskin” segment, which they argue perpetuates harmful stereotypes and tarnishes the reputation of Wild ’N Out.
The lawsuit targets Cannon and several former Wild ’N Out cast members who now work on Bad vs. Wild, claiming their involvement confuses audiences into thinking the two shows are connected.
Viacom is seeking a permanent injunction to stop the production and distribution of Bad vs. Wild, along with financial damages, including treble damages for willful copyright infringement, a complete surrender of profits, and legal fees.
